Complaint: 17/094

Countdown Television

Details

Complainants
R. Scott
advertisers
Progressive Enterprises
Year
2017
Media
Television
Product
Food and Beverage
Clauses
Decision
No Grounds to Proceed
ASA Links
Website Listing
Decision Document

Document

2017_9400.png

COMPLAINT NUMBER 17/094

COMPLAINANT R Scott

ADVERTISER Progressive Enterprises Ltd ADVERTISEMENT Countdown Television DATE OF MEETING 27 March 2017

OUTCOME No Grounds to Proceed


Advertisement: The television advertisement for Countdown shows people doing their shopping at a Countdown supermarket. It also shows staff at Countdown doing their work, which includes helping with the "Food Rescue" charity.

The Chair ruled there were no grounds for the complaint to proceed.

Complainant, R Scott, said: Countdown advert promoting in-store donations to charities. I was very concerned to note that all the people shopping in the store were white skinned and all the people working in the store were brown skinned. This is clearly an example of casual racism which normalizes stereotypes and should not appear on New Zealand television. It is particularly harmful to Maori and Pacific Island youngsters as it promotes negative career aspirations for this group.

The relevant provisions were Code of Ethics - Basic Principle 4; Code for People in

Advertising - Basic Principle 3, Basic Principle 4.

The Chair noted the Complainant's concern that all the people shopping in the store were white skinned and all the people working in the store were brown skinned and that this was an example of casual racism.

The Chair agreed that the main people featured shopping in the store appeared to be

"white-skinned" or European, but disagreed that all the staff depicted were "brown skinned".

The Chair said that, on its own, featuring Europeans as the principal shoppers in the supermarket is not sufficient grounds to be considered a breach of the Code for People in Advertising or the Code of Ethics, as it is not likely to cause serious or widespread offence.

Therefore, the Chair ruled the advertisement had been prepared with a due sense of social responsibility to consumers and there was no apparent breach of Basic Principle 4 of the Code of Ethics or Basic Principles 3 or 4 of the Code for People in Advertising. Accordingly, the Chair ruled there were no grounds for the complaint to proceed.


Chai r' s Ruling: Complaint No Grounds to Proceed