Complaint: 17/218

Tradie Workwear, Television

Details

Complainants
advertisers
Tradie Workwear
Year
2017
Media
Television
Product
Apparel
Clauses
Decision
No Grounds to Proceed
ASA Links
Website Listing
Decision Document

Document

2017_21800.png

COMPLAINT NUMBER 17/218

COMPLAINANT K Seath

ADVERTISER Tradie Workwear ADVERTISEMENT Tradie Workwear, Television DATE OF MEETING 10 July 2017

OUTCOME No Grounds to Proceed


Advertisement: The Tradie Workwear television advertisement shows a man in his underwear, gesturing to the product and jiggling his buttocks. The script says, in part: "Wrap your optic nerves around these bad boys from Tradie. These little beauties give the set up a sweet ride! Resistance ratio check, spot on! Tradie Underwear, the ultimate tool box."

The Chair ruled there were no grounds for the complaint to proceed.

Complainant, K Seath, said: My family and i are not happy to see a man in his under wear and gesturing around his "package" and the bouncing his bottom on the television.

The relevant provisions were Code of Ethics - Basic Principle 4, Rule 4, Rule 5.

The Chair noted the Complainant's concern about the man in his underwear and his actions

including "gesturing around his "package"".

The Chair referred to a precedent decision, 05/293, which was Not Upheld, and in which the Complaints Board confirmed its long-held view that the use of models wearing the underwear product they are promoting is acceptable.

Turning to the advertisement before her, the Chair considered the underwear being advertised and the words and actions of the model. The Chair said the advertisement used a level of humour to connect Tradie Workwear and a pun on the underwear being a "tool box".

The Chair acknowledged the Complainant and their family had found the advertisement offensive, however, the Chair said the advertisement was unlikely to reach the threshold to cause serious or widespread offence and there was no apparent breach of Code of Ethics.

Accordingly, the Chair ruled there were no grounds for the complaint to proceed.


Chai r' s Ruling: Complaint No Grounds to Proceed